Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:50:36 +0400 (AMT)

> > just not yet as mature. What's the need for one more language in
> > this family?
>
> I'm not going to argue about the languages etc. The XML syntax is an 
> advantage. XSLT can be manipulated using XML tools and
> that is just wonderfull sometimes.

XSLT 2.0 is not XML in its major part. Regex and XPath parsers do
not benefit from XML syntax.

David

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
[xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:47:43 +0100 J.Pietschmann - Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:08:47 +0100 Jim Fuller - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:04:53 -0000 Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) - Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:06:11 +0200 David Tolpin - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:50:36 +0400 (AMT) <= Mike Ferrando - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:43:08 -0800 (PST) Rowland Shaw - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:07:47 -0800 David Tolpin - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:43:51 +0400 (AMT) roger . day - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:16:51 +0000

Current Thread

[xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, (continued)
- Rowland Shaw - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:07:47 -0800
  - David Tolpin - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:43:51 +0400 (AMT)
- roger . day - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:16:51 +0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Emmanuil Batsis (Man	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Mike Ferrando
RE: [xsl] Problem turning a xml str, Michael Kay	Date	RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Andrew Welch
	Month