Subject: Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice From: Maik Stührenberg <Maik.Stuehrenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:05:55 +0100 |
Von: Andrew Welch [mailto:AWelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 12:00 An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [xsl] FO Processor choice ----- Has anyone started out with FOP and then had to 'upgrade' to a commercial processor for any reason? Stability will be an issue, so DT's words are a little worrying. What do Ken and DP think? (your books are on order by the way :) ----- We did in fact started out with FOP for a little science project (just plain PDF output with little or no special needs at all). By now we're using XEP, because FOP crashed on larger documents. The difference between both is very small when using them as command line renderer (sorry, we didn't use server-side transformations). Another problem is that FOP's development seems to stall. Best regards, Maik Stührenberg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice, bry |
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Adam Griffin | Date | [xsl] ordering problem, Márcio Ferreira |
Month |