Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: Michael Fuller <msf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:32:12 +1100 |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:43:38PM -0500, Adam Turoff wrote: > > Therefore, if people preferred XSLT 1.0 over other languages when > > performing these tasks, despite its shortcomings, they will certainly > > prefer XSLT 2.0 over other languages. > > Actually, the way XSLT 2.0 is going, I'd much prefer XSLT 1.1 or 1.5: > add the grouping and date handling, remove the nodeset/rtf distinction, > and fix a couple of other warts in XSLT 1.0. *That* would be a killer > language. +1 > The situations that demand input/output validation and XQuery > integration are totally separate domains. That greatly complicates > XSLT 2.0, and obscures the fact that part of XSLT 2.0 is > XSLT 1.0 - warts + fixes. +1 Hell, plus +100. Michael XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Adam Turoff | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, J.Pietschmann | Date | RE: [xsl] Debugging XSLT, Michael Kay |
Month |