Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:50:31 +0400 (AMT) |
> From owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Feb 4 03:12:24 2004 > From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:54:44 -0000 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > > > Are you interested in implementation details? > > > No, but I'm interested in the syntax and semantics of the language. > Any good book on Perl describes the language in detail. The syntax used above is from a real module. A popular book describing Perl is ISBN: 1-56592-149-6, Programming Perl by Wall, Christiansen and Schwartz. Again, I am not a proponent of Perl. That was just to show that perl does XML transformation staff - with just appropriate library modules - just as well as XSLT, but may be with less sharpness than XSLT 1.0 and without reflection (stylesheets can be transformed with XSLT 1.0, perl programs cannot); and it does the rest better than XSLT 2.0. David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Rowland Shaw |
RE: [xsl] date-time formatting ques, Kenny Akridge | Date | [xsl] Control DOCTYPE for HTML outp, Karl J. Stubsjoen |
Month |