Subject: [xsl] Re: alternative for modes From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:09:02 +0100 |
"Peter Billen" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:20040212111038.680BA37E65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Indeed, that's what I wanted, something like 'function pointers' in C/C++ > programming. > > I might be looking into Dimitre's FXSL, but I can't use it in this > situation, since it's a school exercise What do you mean exactly here? I would not call "a school exercise" a tool that gives much more power and makes possible and easy solutions to problems that are considered difficult to implement without this tool. One such case, where FXSL is especially appropriate is the problem described by you.. > and I have to use standard XSLT > specifications (no extensions allowed). The only extension function used by FXSL (for XSLT 1.0) is exslt:node-set(). FXSL is portable across a multitude of XSLT processors as all they implement EXSLT. On my computer I am running a multitude of single-version FXSL applications with: MSXML4 Saxon 6.5.3 Xalan 2.4.1 XalanC 1.5 JD xsltLib 4xslt > > So there is nothing else possible than some crap of if-conditions, to > 'simulate' several modes in one template/function? Everything is possible, even not to use the right tool that is there... Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev FXSL developer, http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL Resume: http://fxsl.sf.net/DNovatchev/Resume/Res.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] alternative for modes, Peter Billen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: alternative for modes, jean pujol |
Re: [xsl] unknown number of columns, Herwig Posedu | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: alternative for modes, jean pujol |
Month |