Subject: RE: [xsl] versioning From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:36:33 +0400 (AMT) |
> > ... Yet it turns out that > > XSLT 2.0 is not upto the task of converting from XSLT 1.0 to XSLT 2.0. > > The problem is that XSLT is not a true XML language: the XPath literals > are not broken up into a tree structure. So in order to transform XSLT 1.0 > it will be almost essential to delegate the XPath parse to some Java code. > Isn't it a problem XSLT 2.0 is designed to address through its string parsing and manipulation primitives? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] versioning, Willink, Ed | Thread | [xsl] Re: versioning, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] FO: Text FLow & Image, Knut Meinke | Date | [xsl] Loading XSL files from styles, cmalderez |
Month |