Re: [xsl] Normalize / Simplify HTML-Tables with row-span / col-span

[Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David,

I've been following your discusiion with Michael here -- I'm curious 
if you have any examples where RTF's in 1.0 are much faster than
the corresponding behavior in 2.0? It doesn't seem intuitive to me.

--jeff




David Tolpin wrote:
> In SAXON 6, I had to switch between tiny tree and normal tree models
> to get performance close to XT for various stylesheets (which was
> still almost twice faster -- in one particular but rather important
> case).
>
> My impression is that restrictions imposed by RTF could be used to
> implement RTF generation more efficiently than node-sets.
>
> Since many stylesheets just generate result tree in one pass and
> do not convert them into node-sets (in XSLT 1.0), a good implementation
> could implement RTF in a much more efficent way than node-set.
>
> David Tolpin
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list