Subject: Re: [xsl] Transparent Images From: "Mark Williams" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:48:51 -0000 |
Thanks for the reply. I'll try out gif instead of png and see if this overcomes problem. Regards, Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 10:09 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] Transparent Images > Mark Williams wrote: > > I don't know if this is an xsl problem or a fop problem. What I am first > > trying to establish is what should be the default xsl behaviour for a > > transparent png in this context. Should the grey background underneath show > > through the transparent sections of the png? > > XSLFO doesn't go into much of a detail when it comes to handling > external graphics. Basically, it states "processor specific". > Well, PDF can handle transparent PNG, and I thought Jimi (used > by FOP) is able to transform PNG with alpha channel into the > corresponding PDF data. You might have hit a PNG subformat which > isn't supported by Jimi (it's old), or a bug. Try converting > the PNG into a GIF first and see whether it works, or into > another PNG subformat (preferably 16 bit color). > > J.Pietschmann > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Transparent Images, J.Pietschmann | Thread | [xsl] Duplicates in multiple, indep, J-P Stacey |
Re: [xsl] Translating XSD into an X, Emmanuil Batsis (Man | Date | Re: [xsl] good enough XSLT processo, David Carlisle |
Month |