Subject: RE: [xsl] What is the future of XSL-FO From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:57:33 +0400 (AMT) |
> Cross vendor compatibility is an issue, especially with so few > implementations > and a complex spec, but it is being resolved. Regarding the spec, times are changing. The XSL FO Recommendation does not look relatively complex anymore; in fact, it is one of relatively small and simple W3C Recommendations. These days. And, as an implementor, I think that it is clean and consistent, which is particularly amazing given the fact it was developed with so many objectives in mind. XSL FO is a success of XSL working group; XSL 1.1 process seems to be promissing too; that is, they are going standardize features already implemented, or add things which have clear and well-defined use cases. If it will not be spoiled, it will be a good one. David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] What is the future of XSL, David . Pawson | Thread | [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL, Célio Cidral Junior |
Re: [xsl] Yahoo XSL-FO list, Antonio Gallardo | Date | [xsl] variable attribute, Bennett |
Month |