Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:40:54 +0400 (AMT) |
> always broughts many problems to me. That's why I started an effort to > replace this tool by something better (XSL-FO, actually). I'm just having > problems with finding an open source library for .NET. I tried NFOP, which > is the .NET port of Apache FOP, but it did not work in my tests; I'm still > sweating to make it work. Why do you need an open-source tool? How will your project benefit from the formatter being open-source? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] how to make "well-formated" x, Ha Nguyen |
Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Using insert-befor, Roger L. Costello |
Month |