Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:31:08 GMT |
> we will eventually have a RELAX-NG validator (using XML schema part 2 > datatypes, that's not a problem, I think). OK, although it will still need something over and above normal relax validation (which is normally defined as just returning a yes or no answer rather than annotating which elements have which types) > But if the first processor processes only W3C schemas, and the second > processor processes only RNG schemas, then I can forsee a problem, It would I think be near impossible to arrange that you could get the same type annotations using relaxng and with xsd (in general) I don't think that would be required as a conformance issue, it would also be OK to fail on any attempt to load an xsd schema, even if you are schema aware, the set of schemas you can load doesn't have to be the whole web, it could be the empty set (as it might be in some embedded systems) David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle |
Month |