Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:38:49 GMT |
> So my decision which way to go, depends upon what xsl:import-schemas > means. Reading the LWC standard, it seemed to me like it was talking > about W3C schemas, but I wasn't 100% clear. A couple of things I forgot to say in my last reply a) Good luck with the project, it would be nice to have more than one xslt2 implementation! b) Note I'm not on the WG so don't take any answer of mine as authoritative, if you don't think the spec is clear ask on the official comment list public-qt-comments@xxxxxx for the text to be clarified. David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] ignoring when tran, Gill Shields |
Month |