Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of XSL-FO From: "Celio Cidral Junior" <ccidral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:46:01 -0300 |
"Wendell Piez" <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu na mensagem news:6.0.0.22.0.20040227151423.02d9f460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Celio, > > At 11:53 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote: > It's an understandable concern. Yet how many vendors are available to > support the format you currently use? (I'm not familiar with Crystal > Reports and its formats or interfaces.) Unfortunately, I'm completely tied with Crystal Reports, and there's no other vendor the Business Objects, which is the currently owner of the product. > Even where you're not benefiting from XSL-FO per se, you may benefit from > relying more generally on XML tech in your framework. That you have only a > few vendors (!) to choose from to help you implement this particular layer > does not speak to all the other advantages and opportunities XML/XSL will > give you. I agree with you. > I bet it's only a matter of time. :-> I'm just waiting for that moment. :-D Cheers, Celio Cidral Junior XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Generating the source XML, Willink, Ed | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of, Celio Cidral Junior |
RE: [xsl] Generating the source XML, Willink, Ed | Date | Re: [xsl] Row Height At Least, Mark Williams |
Month |