Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:24:14 +0100 |
DC said: My xslt 1.0 solution uses 3 temporary trees and a recursive template to remove the 'mm' and sum the correct <colspec>'s respectively. This still seems to run pretty fast, but I'm hoping to do away with it using the new features in 2.0. Now there's a feature that would help out XSL-FO! Arithmetic that catered for 100mm+25mm and added them with a common unit! And it would have made it easier for Andrew! regards DaveP - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Can I change variable con, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0 challenge, Andrew Welch |
Month |