Subject: RE: [xsl] killing xslt From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:21:27 +0100 |
-----Original Message----- From: Oleg Tkachenko By the way, here is more detailed explanation - "Why You Won't See XSLT 2.0 or XPath 2.0 in the Next Version of the .NET Framework" by Dare Obasanjo, http://blogs.msdn.com/dareobasanjo/archive/2004/05/13/131166.aspx <quote>In the decision to go with XQuery over XSLT 2.0, Mark is right that we felt that developers would prefer the familiar procedural model and syntax of XQuery to the template based model and syntax of XSLT 2.0. Most developers working with XSLT try to use it as a procedural language anyway, and don't really harness the power of templates. </quote> Rather condescending? or is it that the clever people use XSLT and the rest use xquery because it doesn't hurt their heads? regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] killing xslt, David . Pawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] killing xslt, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] killing xslt, David . Pawson | Date | Re: [xsl] killing xslt, Oleg Tkachenko |
Month |