Subject: RE: [xsl] killing xslt From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:47:11 +0100 |
> <quote>In the decision to go with XQuery over XSLT 2.0, Mark > is right that > we felt that developers would prefer the familiar procedural model and > syntax of XQuery to the template based model and syntax of > XSLT 2.0. Most > developers working with XSLT try to use it as a procedural > language anyway, > and don't really harness the power of templates. </quote> > The thing I find really weird about that quote is the suggestion that XQuery is somehow more procedural than XSLT. If he's trying to attract developers who think that real languages have assignment statements, then he's mis-selling his product. Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] killing xslt, David . Pawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] killing xslt, bry |
RE: [xsl] dynamically generated XSL, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] [xsl fo] xsl to a minimum / s, ongeaddresseerd onge |
Month |