Subject: RE: [xsl] will processors support XHTML? From: "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.joshua@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:23:02 +0800 |
> <script src="js.js"/> I think you have to make sure the end tag is there by inserting a empty <xsl:text></xsl:text> into the script content. > xsl:output/@method="xhtml" Currently I use method="xml"; but also set the XHTML docType and namespace. I am still very new to this so you might want to do some further checking on that. Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Robert Koberg [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, 29 April, 2004 12:57 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] will processors support XHTML? Hi, I was wondering if the processor developers have any plans to support xsl:output/@method="xhtml" for xsl version 1.0? I see it for XSL v2, so perhaps there is no need, but I am feeling that many will stick with v1 for a while. When people start switching over (to XHTML) there are going to be many frustrated users who have a page outputted with: <script src="js.js"/> or <title/> This will cause the page to not display (even though the xhtml is there) -- they need end elements. Or: <textarea/> which will cause the rest of the page below the textarea to be placed inside of it. Have people found other problems? For a potential faq, here are some workarounds: <script src="js.js">//</script> <xsl:template match="xhtml:title | xhtml:textarea"> <xsl:if test="not(boolean(text()))"> <xsl:text> </xsl:text> </xsl:if> <xsl;apply-templates/> </xsl:template> I wonder how many people have tried to output XHTML only to be frustrated and go back to HTML. best, -Rob
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] MSXML and unwanted entity, Passin, Tom | Thread | [xsl] using a pdf file as backgroun, tien hai nguyen |
[xsl] MSXML and unwanted entity out, Alex Scott | Date | [xsl] using a pdf file as backgroun, tien hai nguyen |
Month |