Subject: RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)] From: "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.joshua@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 15:34:19 +0800 |
> _You_ may consider that > > <x> > <foo/> > <bar/> > </x> > >is XHTML, but just not "strictly conforming to the XHTML spec" That is not even HTML, so would not even pass my 'loose' definition. Could you tell me what else further I need to modify to get it consider XHTML. XSL: <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" indent="yes" doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" doctype-system="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"/> . . . <xsl:template match="input"> <xsl:apply-templates select="label"/> <td class="data"> <xsl:element name="input"> <xsl:attribute name="type"> <xsl:text>text</xsl:text> </xsl:attribute> <xsl:for-each select="name | value"> <xsl:attribute name="{name()}"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </xsl:attribute> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:element> </td> <xsl:apply-templates select="error"/> </xsl:template> Output: <input type="text" name="userName" value=""> </input> Validation output (by http://validator.w3.org/): > 1. Line 160, column 44: end tag for "input" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified > > <input type="text" name="userName" value=""> > > You may have neglected to close a tag, or perhaps you meant to "self-close" a tag; that is, ending it with "/>" instead of ">". > > 2. Line 160, column 0: start tag was here > > <input type="text" name="userName" value=""> > > 3. Line 161, column 7: end tag for element "input" which is not open > > </input> > > The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that element is not currently open. > This is often caused by a leftover end tag from an element that was removed during editing, > or by an implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element being used > where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the case). In the latter case this error > will disappear as soon as you fix the original problem. I see that my <input> should have a separate end tag. How do I stop the end tag from appearing? Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, 27 May, 2004 5:30 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)] I believe you meant the above criteria. However, even if document does not strictly comply to the above, it should be still consider XHTML (just not strictly-conformant XHTML) as long as it is well-formed HTML. As far as XPath/XSLT is concerned a namespace is just part of the name and having the wrong namespace is just the same (and has the same effects on template matching) as having the wrong local name. _You_ may consider that <x> <foo/> <bar/> </x> is XHTML, but just not "strictly conforming to the XHTML spec" but it's not clear if this is really a useful distinction. If by "XHTML but not strictly conforming" you just mean "well formed XML" why not call it "well formed XML"? David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Problems with tables and larg, Antonio Santos |
[xsl] From Thread: XHTML to XHTML t, Mayo | Date | RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into, Michael Kay |
Month |