RE: [xsl] xmlns="" ??

Subject: RE: [xsl] xmlns="" ??
From: "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.joshua@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:28:54 +0800
> By the way there's no real need to do:
>
> <xsl:element name="table">
>
> you can just as easily do
>
> <table>

Side tracking a bit, is there any differences in the above two? If so, when
do we use the former?

Would the later be more optimised, as the XSLT processor does not need to
parse it and then convert it?

Or is the difference purely cosmetic?


Regards,
Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, 30 April, 2004 7:01 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] xmlns="" ??




You want all literal result elements in the stylesheet to be in the
xhtml namespace not no-namespace so mobe
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";

from here
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">

to
here

<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="1.0">

so it looks like

<xsl:stylesheet
 xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
 xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; version="1.0">

You will need similar declarations in the stylesheets
../xsl/libTemporal.xsl etc that you are including if thise stylesheets
also have literal elements that you want to be xhtml.

By the way there's no real need to do:

<xsl:element name="table">

you can just as easily do

<table>

David



Current Thread