Subject: Re: [xsl] Word 2003 schema and XSL From: Emmanouil Batsis <Emmanouil.Batsis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:29:26 +0300 |
We have some very light XML creation needs and we're considering WordI'd actually suggest Open Office over something like Word 2003 since it saves XML, is customizable, open source and free... unless it doesn't have a feature you need?
2003 to allow authors and copyeditors to work in a familiar
environment while also making sure we can quickly get a document into
XML as we need it. We'd actually be using this over something like
XMetaL.
The documents will be simple: paragraphs, headings, bold/italic,
lists, simple tables, an image or two. The approach will be simple as
well (I hope): WordML -> XSL -> Our XML -> repository.
Are there any serious "gotchas" lurking with Word 2003 and WordML?M$ world domination ;-)
I've heard it doesn't live up to the claim of letting the user define and edit against their own schema very well, but that's not a problem for us right now.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Word 2003 schema and XSL, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Word 2003 schema and XSL, David . Pawson |
Re: [xsl] linux xslt debugger/ prof, Jirka Kosek | Date | [xsl] Sort problem, Paolo Noya |
Month |