Subject: RE: [xsl] // and descendant interchangeable ? From: <Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:00:58 +0300 |
Hi, > > I was under the impression that descendant:: and // are > > exactly the same. > > No. "// is short for /descendant-or-self::node()/" > <http://localhost/TR/xpath/#path-abbrev>. That should of course be <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#path-abbrev>. Sorry. Cheers, Jarno - Madam Zu: March 2004
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] // and descendant interch, Jarno.Elovirta | Thread | [xsl] Count problem, Sebastian Fey |
RE: [xsl] // and descendant interch, Jarno.Elovirta | Date | RE: [xsl] Exclude elements in trans, Sönke Ruempler |
Month |