Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having From: cknell@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:00:45 -0400 |
Yes. select="two[*]" -- Charles Knell cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email -----Original Message----- From: john-xsl-list <john-xsl-list@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:49:46 -0400 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having I want to process all second level nodes that have children. Is there an XPath to retrieve all nodes having children, or do I add logic to ignore nodes without children after the XPath has already been evaluated? <one> <two> <three> </two> <two /> <two> <three> </two> </one> Is there an XPath that will only return the first and third instances of <two>?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, john-xsl-list | Thread | [xsl] Alternative to xsl:choose?, john-xsl-list |
Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, Francesco Barresi | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, G. Ken Holman |
Month |