RE: [xsl] xslt processors

[Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Most of the time, the best solution I read here on the list, is to break
down the XML source files into smaller units, and then run cascading XSLTs
on them, if needed.

HTH,
<prs/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Dusan Zatkovsky [mailto:zatkovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 11:30 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt processors

On Thursday 30 of September 2004 16:29, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> xsltproc.

I will extend this question.

Does anybody know some other and fast xslt processors written in c/c++
except xalan and xsltproc for linux?

I have this problem:

I want to transform big xml documents to text data.

Situation:

xml size=2MB
XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc.
Parsing/transforming time is 1:2. So when I run Xalan, it tooks about
8 sec to initialize and 15 sec to transform.

xsltproc transform it ok with speed 4-5 times faster than XalanC.
Parsing/transforming time is about 1:1 (3 and 4 seconds)


xml size=17MB
XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc.
Parsing/transforming times are 20/60 sec.

But xsltproc initialization tooks very long time (after 5 minutes I have
killed that process).

So, I can't use xsltproc to transform big xml files (and our project need to
transform up to 300-400MB xml files) and can't use XalanC because low
transforming speed.

Anybody can help me?


-- 

Dusan Zatkovsky