Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt processors From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 09 Oct 2004 17:57:39 +0100 |
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Kenton <jeffrey.kenton@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Jeff> Well, that is disappointing. As good as Saxon is (and it's Jeff> very good -- no quibbles on that point), it would be nice to Jeff> see other companies jump on the bandwagon and pick up all Jeff> the new features of XSLT 2.0 Why companies? Why not individuals. If you're really impatient, you can try and compile mine from CVS. It doesn't implement all of the specifications yet, but it will work for some stylesheets. But I have no intention of making pre-compiled binaries available at this stage, since it isn't ready for beta testing. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Jeff Kenton | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Jeff Kenton | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, M. David Peterson |
Month |