Subject: Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling - only print *first* in sorted list?? From: Kenneth Stephen <marvin.the.cynical.robot@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:09:42 -0500 |
Hi, Why dont you write a second XSL program and have it operate on the sorted output of the first? The document order for the preceding-sibling in the second program will be the right order that you need. Regards, Kenneth On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:55:29 -0400, Hardy Merrill <hmerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was trying to use "preceding-sibling" to figure out if the previous > sibling ***in sorted order*** had the same district, but I've now > figured out after reading on the subject that "preceding-sibling" does > not operate on the sorted tree - instead it operates on the original > tree that is in "document" order. > > I'd like to use the best/most efficient method to solve this problem - > the muncheon technique using keys if possible. Can I do that, and if > so, how?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling, Hardy Merrill | Thread | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Hardy Merrill |
[xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling, Hardy Merrill | Date | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Hardy Merrill |
Month |