Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with msxml english language, danish characters, weird results

["W. Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael Kay wrote:

> > Michael Kay wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The UCA is written as if there is a single correct
> > > answer, but there isn't.
> >
> > The UCA doesn't define a particular collation sequence for any 
> > languages, rather it defines the requirements for how collation 
> > mechanisms should allow you to define the collation rules for a given 
> > language and script. 
>
>
> Yes, I should have made that clear. But it doesn't handle things like
> collating ISO-646 before ISO-10646, which is what you will often find phone
> books and back-of-book indexes doing.

I'm not sure I'm following here--at least using Java RuleBasedCollator 
you should be able to achieve any collation sequence whatsoever.

But I'm not sure what you mean by sorting 646 before 10646.

Cheers,

E.
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-8122

eliot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.innodata-isogen.com