Subject: Re: [xsl] Identity Transform Grouping Question From: <ethan.kalfus@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:19:01 -0500 |
Hi Geert, <Why use the node-set function here if you could use a key as well?> This technique was offered to me by someone else. It performs quite well, compared to other attempts to use "ancestor", so I didn't see the need to change it (unless, for some reason, I couldn't use the node-set extension). If you wouldn't mind posting your complete suggested code changes I'd be happy to run some tests on volume data and report my findings. Thanks! - Ethan Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Identity Transform Groupi, Geert Josten | Thread | [xsl] Help needed to make XSL for m, Lim Siew Yin |
Re: [xsl] XML/XSL free editor (ecli, Thorbjørn Ravn Ander | Date | [xsl] Java Class Question, Charles Griswold |
Month |