Re: [xsl] looping through global parameters

[Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>]

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
 xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
 xmlns:lookup="my:lookup"
  exclude-result-prefixes="lookup">
  
  <lookup:element
     temporary-directory="/var/temp"
     search-local-classes-first="false"
  />

  <xsl:template match="node()">
    <xsl:copy>
      <xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/>
    </xsl:copy>
  </xsl:template>
  
  <xsl:template match="@*">
    <xsl:copy-of select="."/>
    <xsl:copy-of select="document('')/*/lookup:element/@*
                                  [name() = name(current())]"/>
  </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>


Note: it is necessary to use elements instead of attributes in the
lookup, if the substitution values can be changed as result of
attribute normalization.

I just wanted to be different here :o)

Cheers,
Dimitre.


On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:57:46 -0500, Ann Marie Rubin
<annmarie.rubin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello List,
> 
> I have a stylesheet that defines 2 global parameters: attr and value.
> The stylesheet has a template that matches all attributes, and if the
> current attribute name matches the global attr, outputs value.
> 
>    <xsl:template match="@*" priority="10">
>    <xsl:attribute name="{name()}">
> 
>            <xsl:choose>
>                <xsl:when test="name()=$attr"><xsl:value-of
> select="$value"/></xsl:when>
>                <xsl:otherwise><xsl:value-of select="."/></xsl:otherwise>
>            </xsl:choose>
>        </xsl:attribute>
>      </xsl:template>
> 
> Requirements have changed and now the calling process will parse the
> stylesheet to write a set of global parameters for the values that need
> to be updated, like so:
> 
> <xsl:param name="attr">temporary-directory</xsl:param>
> <xsl:param name="value">/var/temp</xsl:param>
> <xsl:param name="attr1">search-local-classes-first</xsl:param>
> <xsl:param name="value1">false</xsl:param>
> .
> .
> .
> 
> Is there a way to loop through the global attributes and call the
> template for each one?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ann Marie