Subject: Re: [xsl] alternative to FO? From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:49:01 -0500 |
It might be option for some users who don't want care about FO or TeX and have not very demanding rendering requirements.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek | Thread | Re: [xsl] alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek |
Re: [xsl] alternative to FO?, Jirka Kosek | Date | [xsl] variables vs. modes, Bruce D'Arcus |
Month |