Subject: Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter mapping expression From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 05 Dec 2004 08:43:44 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimtre" == Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Dimtre> Because, according to the XPath 2.0 spec: "only the last Dimtre> step in a path is allowed to return a sequence of atomic Dimtre> values." Dimtre> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-path-expressions Ah, yes, of course. As usual, I stopped reading too early. Dimtre> <xsl:sequence select= "for $this in $pList1 return Dimtre> f:apply($pFun, $this)" /> Well, if u want something more compact (why?)? for $t in $pList return f:apply ($pFun, $t) :-) Still not compact enough? How about: f:apply-2 ($pFun, $pList) :-) :-) <xsl:function name="f:apply-2"> <xsl:param name="pFunc" as="element()"/> <xsl:param name="arg1"/> <xsl:sequence select="for $t in $arg1 return f:apply ($pFun, $t)" /> </xsl:function> Still not compact enough? How about: f:a ($pFun, $pList) :-) :-) :-) I don't understand the compactness requirement. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, Dimtre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Looking for a shorter map, M. David Peterson |
Month |