Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?

Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:16:43 GMT
> unsatisfactory about that solution. It still leaves the question: is there an alternative for 
> position()?

What have you got against position()
It's very hard to think of answers to your question without knowing
_why_ you are trying to solve the problem only using a subset of the
language, and without knowing exactly which subset that is.

David


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread