Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:16:43 GMT |
> unsatisfactory about that solution. It still leaves the question: is there an alternative for > position()? What have you got against position() It's very hard to think of answers to your question without knowing _why_ you are trying to solve the problem only using a subset of the language, and without knowing exactly which subset that is. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, Geert Josten | Thread | Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, Geert Josten |
Re: [xsl] selecting multiple elemen, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] apply 2 diff xsl on the s, David Carlisle |
Month |