Re: [xsl] recursive counter not incrementing

[Christopher Hansen <chansen1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, i've changed it to that.


On Thu,  9 Dec 2004 19:41:51 +0000, Antsnio Mota <xptm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I have not read this thred from the begining but shouldn't that be
>
> test="count($s1/item|$s2/item)=count($s2/item)">
>
> Citando Christopher Hansen <chansen1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > David,
> > Thanks for suggesting the count/union operation...i researched it a
> > little bit and it makes complete sense, however i must be doing
> > something wrong because its not returning TRUE when it should be...see
> > the IF statement in the subset template below.  I've reminded you how
> > i initialized $s1 and $s2 in the main template....
> >
> >
> >  <!--using the 2nd transaction...-->
> >  <xsl:variable name="transitems1"
> > select="document('transactions.xml')//transaction[2]" />
> >
> > <xsl:output method="html"/>
> >   <xsl:template match="/">
> >
> >       <!-- set1 = 1st itemset consisting of 3 items Milk, Butter, Eggs
> > (using itemsets.xml)-->
> >       <xsl:variable name="set1" select= "frequent_item_sets//set[1]" />
> >       <!-- set2 = 2nd transaction, 11 items (Milk, Butter, and Eggs
> > among them) -->
> >       <xsl:variable name="set2" select="$transitems1/items" />
> >
> >           <!--output both sets-->
> >           <xsl:value-of select="$set1"/>
> >           <xsl:value-of select="$set2"/>
> >
> >       <xsl:call-template name="subset">
> >            <xsl:with-param name="s1" select="$set1"/>
> >            <xsl:with-param name="s2" select="$set2"/>
> >       </xsl:call-template>
> >
> > <xsl:template name="subset">
> >      <xsl:param name="s1"/>
> >      <xsl:param name="s2"/>
> >
> >     <xsl:value-of select="count($s1/item)"/> <!--shows '3' -->
> >     <xsl:value-of select="count($s2/item)"/> <!--shows '11'-->
> >
> >     <!--following is not executing-->
> >     <xsl:if test="count($s1/item|$s2/item)=count($s1/item)">
> >         <b>S1 is a subset of S2.</b>
> >     </xsl:if>
> >
> > </xsl:template>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:50:52 GMT, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I read the problem as being based on equality rather than identity of
> > nodes,
> > > > but I might not have read carefully enough...
> > >
> > > I read it that way, but was trying to be Jeni and answered what I
> > > suspected was the real question. We'll see if I really am Jeni
> > > or not...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
> > > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> > > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> > > http://www.star.net.uk
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
> O SAPO ja esta livre de vmrus com a Panda Software, fique vocj tambim!
> Clique em: http://antivirus.sapo.pt