Subject: Re: [xsl] In which sequence should specs be read? From: Marian Olteanu <mou_softwin@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:13:58 -0800 (PST) |
> In my opinion, there is no such sequence, in practise. > I've been implementing xslt 2.0 now for a year, and still, I am > continually cross-checking between the various specs. > > However, if you have the ability to read and totally absorb a > specification at one reading then you might try a sequence like: > > 1) XML > 2) XML Names > 3) XML Schema > 4) XPath Data Model > 5) XPath > 6) XPath/XQuery functions and operators > 5) XSLT > 6) XSLT/XQuery serialization I don't implement XSLT 2.0 (I'm sticked to 1.0) so I'll express my oppinion about this list for XSLT 1.0 1) XML - a must. But for the start, a tutorial might be enough. 2) XML Names - a must. But still, for the start, a tutorial might be enough. 3) XML Schema - not a must. May be totally skipped in the beginning. 4) XPath Data Model - of course, a must 5) XPath - a must 6) XPath/XQuery functions and operators - XQuery... who needs XQuery when is implementing XSLT? 5) XSLT - also a must 6) XSLT/XQuery serialization - this has nothing to do with XPath 1.0/XSLT 1.0. In fact, parts of it are included in XSLT 1.0 spec ===== Marian http://www.utdallas.edu/~mgo031000/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] In which sequence should , Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] In which sequence should , Colin Paul Adams |
[xsl] XSD Validation with XSLT, Robert Soesemann | Date | Re: [xsl] In which sequence should , Colin Paul Adams |
Month |