Subject: Re: [xsl] Best way to count siblings From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:04:24 GMT |
<xsl:value-of select="count(preceding-sibling::* | following-sibling::*)"/> count(../*) -1 is shorter, you;d have to ask an implementer which is more efficient. Often the siblings are the current node list in which case last()-1 is likely to be the most efficient. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Best way to count sibling, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Best way to count sibling, Michael Kay |
RE: FW: [xsl] Siblings, Arun Sinha | Date | Re: [xsl] Different (body) layout o, Christian Rosberg |
Month |