RE: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group

Subject: RE: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:26:15 -0000
> When changing the xsl from 1.0 to 2.0 there 
> were errors.
> Is it simpler to do that, or use Muenchian grouping for the Customer?

If you were saying that a stylesheet that worked under 1.0 didn't work under
a 2.0 processor, then this is unusual and it would be nice to know the
details.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

> 
> 
> <xsl:for-each select="Trade">
> 
> <xsl:sort select="Customer"/> 
> 
> <tr class="r{position() mod 2}">
> 
> <td><xsl:value-of select="Customer"/> </td>
> 
> <td><xsl:value-of select="TradeId"/><xsl:text/></td>
> 
> <td><xsl:value-of select="Type"/><xsl:text/></td>
> 
> <td align="right">
> <xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(Step
>    
> [concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),su
> bstring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&gt;=
> concat(substring($global,7),substring($global,1,2),substring($
> global,4,2))]
>    
> [concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),su
> bstring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&lt;
> concat(substring($global,7)+3,substring($global,1,2),substring
> ($global,4,2))]
>    /StepCharge)+ sum(Step
>    
> [concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),su
> bstring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&gt;=
> concat(substring($global,7),substring($global,1,2),substring($
> global,4,2))]
>    
> [concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),su
> bstring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&lt;
> concat(substring($global,7)+3,substring($global,1,2),substring
> ($global,4,2))]
>    /StepSetoff)  , '###,###,##0')"/>
> </td>
> 
> </xsl:for-each>
> 
> Thanks,
> Dmitri
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Jan 5, 2005 4:50 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group
> 
> First read up about standard grouping techniques such as 
> Muenchian grouping
> at http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/grouping
> 
> Computing a subtotal for each group is then a minor variant of the
> technique: instead of merely iterating over the items in the 
> group using
> xsl:for-each, you can assign the node-set comprising the group to a
> variable, and then sum over that using the sum() function.
> 
> Like all grouping problems, it's much easier in 2.0:
> 
> <xsl:for-each-group select="rows" group-by="columnA">
>   <xsl:apply-templates select="current-group()"/>
>   <subtotal><xsl:value-of 
> select="sum(current-group()/columnB)"/></subtotal>
> </xsl:for-each-group>
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/ 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dsk [mailto:dmitrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: 05 January 2005 04:09
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group
> > 
> > 
> > within a for-each there might be various sets of values which 
> > produce the 
> > following grid, where val is equal to a number
> > 
> > a  val val val
> > a  val val val
> > a  val val val
> > b  val val val
> > b  val val val
> > c  val val val
> > c  val val val
> > 
> > what is the best way to insert a sum line for the first
> > column a, one for b, and one for c.
> > 
> > is a nested for each needed? or checking to see if the 
> > following value is 
> > not equal to the preceding, then then summing?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Dmitri
> > 
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.802 / Virus Database: 545 - Release Date: 11/26/2004

Current Thread