RE: [xsl] XSL Transformation overhead

["Bhaskar, Rajan" <RBhaskar@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks, prs

-----Original Message-----
From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort [mailto:pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 11:32 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Transformation overhead


Hi Rajan,

in addition to all the posts, if your xslt stylesheets do not change,
then
you will want to preload them and add them to some type of cache, this
would
eliminate multiple parsing and loading penalties.

Also, starting up Java has some costs but only the first time.

60,000 faxes per hour of each 50KB does require some hardware, and I
think
it would be appropiate to have each transformation conclude as this
frees up
resources.

Like MK and other say, your next step should be running and monitoring
the
system and if necessary determine performance bottlenecks - that way
you'll
get to the specific system components that you should change in one way
or
another.

When you do that you'll be able to come up with more specific questions.

Good luck!

HTH,
<prs/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Bhaskar, Rajan [mailto:RBhaskar@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 2:14 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] XSL Transformation overhead


Hi,
 I want to know which if xsl transformation of xml or xml parsing would
provide better performance in increased load.
Our system requires around 15TPS and everyday during the peak 2 hours a
volume of 120000 faxes needs to sent/received.
the xml size is app. 50KB.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Rajan