Subject: Re: [xsl] XALAN-FOP Performance and Push-Pull Processing From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:54:50 GMT |
> Is more memory used because of Anyone who's followed this list for a day or two will tell you that I'm reasonably reliable for answers concerning XSLT programming but distinctly unreliable for any aspects of implementation:-) However pretty much all current XSLT processors slurp up the entire document before starting so the major memory cost is already used up before any processing starts. > Are XSLT processors such as Saxon or XALAN built with anything > internal that determines the processing based on something as simple as > Push or Pull, or anything else? I defer to those who have implemented a processor (or opened up the source zip files to look at the implemntations) There are plenty of such people on the list. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XALAN-FOP Performance and, cfisher | Thread | [xsl] Server Side Including an XSL , Eric Scott Johnson |
[xsl] how to call extension functio, Kevin Rodgers | Date | RE: [xsl] selecting HTML Options, Chris_Graham |
Month |