Subject: Re: [xsl] optimization for very large, flat documents From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:19:20 +1100 |
> I think that in practice if you want to do serial transformation then a > functional language is not the right answer: if you can only look at each > piece of input data once, then you need the ability to remember what you > have seen, so you need a procedural language with updatable memory. That's > why STX was invented. This is not exactly so. Haskell handles quite well dynamic stream processing of infinite length -- this can be accomplished via a number of different ways, for example a combination of foldl - like processing with lazy evaluation. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] optimization for very lar, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] XPath for leaf nodes, David P. Nesbitt |
Re: [xsl] XPath performance compari, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] apply-templates not working, omprakash . v |
Month |