Subject: Re: [xsl] Disable output-escaping From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 25 Jan 2005 17:56:54 +0000 |
>>>>> "Wendell" == Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Wendell> I can't speak to the issue of what "deprecated" should Wendell> mean Well, what it means to me, as someone implementing an XSLT 2.0 processor from scratch, is that I SHOULDN'T implement it. So I won't (although it would only take me about 10 minutes to do so) Wendell> worth noting, again, that the problems that come with Wendell> d-o-e are all related to the fact that, unlike almost Wendell> everything else you do in XSLT, what this feature Wendell> controls is the serializer that writes the output to a Wendell> file, not the processor that generates the output (the Wendell> "result tree") to begin with. Wendell> A reason it is optional is that serializers are optional, Wendell> and if an implementor builds an engine with no Wendell> expectation that the result tree will be written out to a Wendell> file, how is it to be handled? What about character maps then? They require a serializer too, and are not optional. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Disable output-escaping, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Disable output-escaping, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] Newbie - XML and XSLT samples, Julian Voelcker | Date | [xsl] XML to XML conversion, Nick Roberts |
Month |