Subject: Re: [xsl] Disable output-escaping From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:44:21 -0500 |
Wendell> A reason it is optional is that serializers are optional, Wendell> and if an implementor builds an engine with no Wendell> expectation that the result tree will be written out to a Wendell> file, how is it to be handled?
What about character maps then? They require a serializer too, and are not optional.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Disable output-escaping, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Disable output-escaping, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Newbie - XML and XSLT sam, Joris Gillis | Date | RE: [xsl] generic sort based on att, Chaitanya Desai |
Month |