RE: [xsl] XML to XML conversion

Subject: RE: [xsl] XML to XML conversion
From: "Touchtel" <omprakashv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:05:24 +0530
    Thats right. The correct URL is

-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:50 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] XML to XML conversion

Your first link doesn'r work. Is it ?

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:04:19 +0530, Touchtel
<omprakashv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>        Hi,
>             You say you understand xml and xsl concepts but then say that
> xml-to-xml conversion is a grey area. You are right in assuming xml-to-xml
> conversion is necessary though. I assume you are talking about XSLT when
> talk of xml-to-xml conversion because that is the main task of XSLT: to
> convert from a source vocabulary to a target vocabulary. In the case of
> xml-to-xml conversion, both the source and target vocabularies happen to
> xml. The XSL-FO specification talks of transforming an XML document to FO
> which by the way is XML. Maybe that will help you understand more about
> going from XML to XML. should have some
> resources as well as the renderx website and
> house website
> Regards,
> Omprakash.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Roberts [mailto:nick_roberts5@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:39 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] XML to XML conversion
> i'm aware that one of XML's key benefits is the ability to standardise a
> dataset, allowing compatibilty between incompatible systems and efficiency
> of data exchange.
> In this case, am I correct in assuming that xml-to-xml conversion is
> neccessary?
> I'm having difficulties finding any resources for this area. I understand
> XML and XSL concepts, but there seems to be a grey area over XML to XML
> conversion.
> I'd be most grateful if anyone good point me in the directions of any
> articles or books that may be of use.
> Thanks in advance,
> nick

Current Thread