Subject: RE: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 nodes From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:31:48 -0000 |
> If you are only needing it to work on the given document then > I think in > general for two element nodes, the shortest relative Xpath > can always be > expressed in the form > > xxx::*[n] > Do you want the shortest XPath expression, or the XPath expression whose evaluation touches fewest nodes? following-sibling::*[5]/child::*[2] or following::*[29] ? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Reusing XML content as I , Joris Gillis | Date | [xsl] Re: Testing Transformation Fi, Julian Voelcker |
Month |