Subject: Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 03 Mar 2005 20:22:29 +0000 |
>>>>> "David" == David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> You can remove that assumption of an intelligent optimizer, by >> placing the common sub-expression into a variable. David> only in xslt2, the sort key has to be a single xpath, so David> you can't bind variables in xpath1. Ah. I tend to forget about that old xslt 1.0 thing :-) I also note that the original problem doesn't state which processor or version of xslt. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] a sorting conundrum, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Finding the position of node , Jan Rademan | Date | Re: [xsl] escaping/entities on the , Kevin Rodgers |
Month |