Subject: Re: [xsl] A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the [nth] argument of [function] From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:12:16 -0800 (PST) |
Thanks Colin for your reply.. I also felt so.. I feel this is appropriate! I'll just compare this with the Windows example I gave.. If I am running my PC as Windows 2000(similar to using Saxon 8.1), I cannot expect it to function as *Windows 98 only m/c*.. Overall everything seems fine.. Afterall its agreed by so many WG members.. Regards, Mukul --- Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Gandhi > <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Mukul> I have another question - If I am using a > XSLT 2.0 > Mukul> processor (like Saxon 8.1), which > provides backward > Mukul> compatibility.. How can I ask Saxon 8.1 > to work as *XSLT > Mukul> 1.0 only* processor? > > You can't. > -- > Colin Paul Adams > Preston Lancashire > > __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] A sequence of more than o, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] A sequence of more than o, Mukul Gandhi |
Re: [xsl] A sequence of more than o, Colin Paul Adams | Date | [xsl] Operational system date, Marcos Hercules dos |
Month |