Subject: Re: [xsl] XML to Database Inserts via XSLT From: Brian Chrisman <incubus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:40:18 -0800 |
> This is akin to what some of the XQuery/relational vendors are doing: except > that they push as much of the query to the database as possible, to make > maximum use of indexes. > > In principle you could implement the XPath data model directly as a view of > the database, but relational databases are much happier doing a small number > of large queries rather than millions of small ones. (If only we still had > Codasyl databases...) Saxon's NodeInfo interface is actually slightly higher > level than the XPath data model as described in the specs (because it > supports navigation using the XPath axes) but a direct mapping of this > interface onto SQL would still be a rather significant challenge, and > wouldn't give as good performance as systems that translate whole FLWR > expressions into SQL. My first instinct was having the xpath processor calling methods internal to the database (whatever the database uses to lookup its data after parsing SQL).. seemed like trouble to marshal the query into SQL only to have it reparsed by the database engine.. but I guess that shouldn't involve too much overhead anyways... not to mention being able to use it with different databases.... certainly performance would be an issue regardless... I hadn't looked at Xquery and FLWR expressions... or the efforts at pushing those queries into the database... thanks for the tip... am reading up on them and the sql extension now.. Maybe they'll get me closer to my 'holy grail'. :-) -Brian > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XML to Database Inserts v, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XML to Database Inserts v, Barry Lay |
Re: [xsl] XSLt in RDBMs engine? (wa, Chris_Graham | Date | [xsl] what does this statement mean, RQamar |
Month |