Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:47:42 +0000 |
Yes, in portuguese should be "terrmvel", and it too can have both a "wonderful" or a "horrible" meaning, so i didn't know what the sense was... And frankly, being about MS i thought of the later... On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:59:31 -0600, JBryant@xxxxxxxxx <JBryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > :) > > "terrific" = good > > Its root is the Latin terrere, to frighten. English (and I suppose other > languages) has an interesting way of reversing the meanings of some > adjectives over time. This is one of those adjectives. One informal use of > "bad" means good, too. And "awful" and "awesome" have traded meanings from > what they had about 5 centuries ago. > > Now that I am WAY off topic.... > > Jay Bryant > Bryant Communication Services > (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) > > Antsnio Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> > 03/10/2005 02:47 PM > Please respond to > xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To > xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > cc > > Subject > Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files > > Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert, the > "terrific" here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the > sense of "terror" or in the sense of "uau!". > > Or simply putting it it's :) or :( ? > > Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a platform > agnostic thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is > straithforward? > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort > <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific XML support, > and > > use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/ > > > > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon product to .NET > and > > Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in Saxon, therefore all > > credits go to its creator, Michael Kay. > > > > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is currently about > 25% > > slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to this - > you > > can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon transformations in the > > background and return to you the output, which is the same as running > Saxon > > from the command line, and thus has the same performance. > > > > Cheers, > > <prs/> > > http://www.pietsieg.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, JBryant | Thread | RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, Pieter Reint Siegers |
RE: [xsl] Variables and HTML, Pieter Reint Siegers | Date | Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, António Mota |
Month |