Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files

[JBryant@xxxxxxxxx]

We have Tomcat working with IIS here without complaint from either our
systems administrator or the developers. I don't know what they had to do
to get it to work. It was done before I got here and is not mine to
maintain, so I've never looked at it. But it works.

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)




Antsnio Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2005 06:42 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files






Last time i checked out that possibility i've read lots of complaints
about that solution not working correctly, but it was some months ago,
i'll check it out again.

Thanks.


On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:39:25 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
<pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Of course, there are more roads that lead to Rome :-)
>
> Cheers,
> <prs/>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 05:55 p.m.
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
>
> I haven't done it myself, but it's quite possible to install a Java
servlet
> container such as tomcat under IIS:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/install/iis.html
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 10 March 2005 22:57
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
> >
> > I'll go talk to our administration guy to try to know if there is
> > allready a asp.net in the server, as i think they allready develop in
> > asp.net, but it's not really my domain...
> >
> > I'll get back to you later if i need some help installing Saxon.NET.
> > But i still wold prefer Java...
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:18:12 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
> > <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > :)
> > >
> > > ASP.NET and ASP can coexist on one web server. And it's not
> > that platform
> > > specific as you think it is (yes, classic ASP was, but that
> > goes for many
> > > script languages, even today) - since the .NET Framework is
> > built on an ECMA
> > > standard (the CLI - see
> > >
> > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm)
> > > you'll easily find your way to Linux and Mac OSX through
> > Mono compatible
> > > projects. Develop in Windows and deploy almost anywhere, I'd say.
> > >
> > > To stay on the XSLT 2.0 track, MS will not add any XSLT 2.0
> > until there is a
> > > stable W3C Rec available - at least that is what I've
> > picked up until now -
> > > so that's why we've started the Saxon.NET effort. Although
> > early and a bit
> > > slow I'd say it is a wonderful step forward.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > <prs/>
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Antsnio Mota [mailto:amsmota@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Jueves, 10 de Marzo de 2005 02:48 p.m.
> > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive xsl files
> > >
> > > Hmmm, since i'm not a english native *and* not a MS expert,
> > the "terrific"
> > > here is a good thing or a bad thing? It's "terrific" in the sense of
> > > "terror" or in the sense of "uau!".
> > >
> > > Or simply putting it it's   :)    or    :(   ?
> > >
> > > Now we're using a IIS with asp on it, but i'll prefer a
> > platform agnostic
> > > thing. The upgrade(?) a "normal" asp to asp.net is straithforward?
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:36:04 -0600, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
> > > <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > One way would be to upgrade to ASP.NET with its terrific
> > XML support,
> > > > and use Saxon.NET which supports XSLT 2.0.
> > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxondotnet/
> > > >
> > > > NB1: Saxon.NET is an OS effort to port the great Saxon
> > product to .NET
> > > > and Mono. All functionality offered has its origin in
> > Saxon, therefore
> > > > all credits go to its creator, Michael Kay.
> > > >
> > > > NB2: Saxon.NET is still an early beta product, and is
> > currently about
> > > > 25% slower than using Saxon (on Windows). There is a workaround to
> > > > this - you can spawn processes in ASP.NET which run Saxon
> > > > transformations in the background and return to you the
> > output, which
> > > > is the same as running Saxon from the command line, and
> > thus has the same
> > > performance.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > <prs/>
> > > > http://www.pietsieg.com