Re: [xsl] Recursive?

[Sven Waibel <sven.waibel@xxxxxxxx>]

I have a problem now.

I count numbering to indent it.

I did it this way

margin-left="concat(string-length(numbering)-1,'mm')"

but so i don't get the result.

Sven

Michael Kay wrote:

> Processing a recursive data structure should always be done recursively.
> 
> I can't see anything in this requirement that can't be satisfied by a
> completely straightforward set of template rules using the standard
> <xsl:apply-templates/> technique at each level to process the children. If
> you're struggling with it, it would be helpful to know where your
> difficulties are.
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>  
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sven Waibel [mailto:sven.waibel@xxxxxxxx] 
>>Sent: 17 March 2005 08:56
>>To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [xsl] Recursive?
>>
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>my xml:
>><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-15"?>
>><it>
>>	<tt id="20">
>>		<numbering>1</numbering>
>>		<name><![CDATA[test0]]></name>
>>		<tc id="4611686020000000015">
>>			<numbering>1.1</numbering>
>>			<name><![CDATA[test1]]></name>
>>		</tc>
>>	</tt>
>>	<tt id="21">
>>		<numbering>2</numbering>
>>		<name><![CDATA[test2]]></name>
>>		<tt id="22">
>>			<numbering>2.1</numbering>
>>			<name><![CDATA[test3]]></name>
>>			<tt id="23">
>>				<numbering>2.1.1</numbering>
>>				<name><![CDATA[tgf]]></name>
>>				<tc id="4611686020000000012">
>>					<numbering>2.1.1.1</numbering>
>>					<name><![CDATA[test4]]></name>
>>				</tc>
>>				<tc id="4611686020000000013">
>>					<numbering>2.1.1.2</numbering>
>>					<name><![CDATA[test5]]></name>
>>				</tc>
>>			</tt>
>>			<tc id="4611686020000000014">
>>				<numbering>2.1.2</numbering>
>>				<name><![CDATA[test6]]></name>
>>			</tc>
>>		</tt>
>>	</tt>
>></it>
>>
>>I want to get this:
>>
>>number name
>>
>>1 test0
>>  1.1 test1
>>2 test2
>>  2.1 test3
>>    2.1.1 test4
>>      2.1.1.1 test5
>>      2.1.1.2 test6
>>    2.1.2 test7
>>
>>
>>Should i do it recursively or is there a better way to achieve it?
>>
>>Thanks and best regards.
>>
>>Sven
>>  2.