Subject: Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed template rule From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:08:34 -0700 |
That's what I figured. I was hoping to avoid such. It's much cleaner to right a single apply-templates rule. Uggg. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:54:06 GMT, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > How do I setup a template rule for this non-existent match? > > You can't: templates are fired by matching nodes, if you select an empty > node set, then no templates will be invoked. > > If you want something to happen if there is not an ABC/D child do > > <xsl:if test="not(ABC/D)"> > something > </xsl:if> > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Docbook index problem, Hiral Parikh |
Month |