Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:16:33 -0700 |
Wendell: I'm very excited... will give this a whirl tomorrow. On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:03:38 +0000, Aron Bock <aronbock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wendell, if this works (heheh) it's very cool! It inspires me to learn > about XSL's "built-in" set operations capabilities. > > --A > > >From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:26:06 -0500 > > > >Karl, > > > >It turned out that keys weren't actually necessary: as posed (as I > >understand it) the colors problem could be solved with a simple (if not > >obvious) test. But using a key does make it slightly more efficient: > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Aron Bock | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Karl Stubsjoen |
[xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Ne, Arthur Maloney | Date | Re: [xsl] replacement more than o, omprakash . v |
Month |